top of page
fnlogo.png

Digital Euro Gains Momentum as Europe Pushes to Reduce Dependence on US Payment Giants

Jun 24
4 min read

The European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee has backed the long-awaited digital euro, giving the project fresh political momentum as the EU seeks to strengthen its financial autonomy and reduce reliance on US-dominated payment infrastructure.


 

The vote, reported on 23 June 2026, is not the final approval of the digital euro, but it is an important step in the legislative process. The European Parliament is expected to formalise the committee’s position during a plenary vote in Strasbourg in early July, after which negotiations with the EU’s 27 Member States can move forward. Lawmakers are aiming to reach a final agreement before the end of the year, while the European Central Bank is working on the assumption that a pilot could begin in 2027 and that a full launch may be possible in 2029.

 

The digital euro would be a digital form of central bank money issued and backed by the ECB. It would not replace cash, but would operate alongside physical banknotes and coins as another way to pay in euros. In practical terms, individuals would be able to hold digital euros in a wallet provided through a bank, post office or other payment service provider.

 

They could then use the wallet to make payments in shops, online or directly to other individuals.

 

The political argument behind the project has become stronger as Europe’s dependence on non-European payment networks has come under greater scrutiny. According to ECB data cited in recent reporting, Visa and Mastercard account for 61% of card payments in the euro area and almost all cross-border card transactions. That concentration has made payments a sovereignty issue, not just a financial technology issue. European policymakers increasingly view payment infrastructure as part of the bloc’s economic security, especially in a world of trade tensions, sanctions disputes and geopolitical fragmentation.

 

Supporters of the digital euro argue that Europe needs a public, pan-European payment option that can work across the euro area and reduce dependence on foreign card schemes and digital wallets. The ECB has described the project as a way to preserve monetary sovereignty in a rapidly digitalising economy, while ensuring that citizens and businesses continue to have access to public money in digital form.

 

The proposed system would support both online and offline payments. Offline functionality is one of the more important design features because it would allow payments even where there is poor or no internet connection. This could make the payment system more resilient during network outages, power failures or other disruptions. The offline version is also expected to offer a cash-like level of privacy, with transaction details known only to the payer and the payee.

 

Privacy remains one of the most sensitive issues in the debate. The ECB has stated that the Eurosystem would not be able to directly identify users from their digital euro transactions.

For online payments, payment service providers would still carry out anti-money laundering checks and would be able to identify users where required for compliance purposes. For offline payments, AML checks would take place when users load or unload digital euros from the wallet, similar to the way cash deposits and withdrawals are treated today.

 

The digital euro would also be designed as a public good. Basic services are expected to be free for users, and the ECB has emphasised that people without bank accounts should also be able to access it. This gives the project a financial inclusion angle, particularly for vulnerable consumers, people with limited digital skills, people without stable housing and those who may struggle to access conventional banking services.

 

At the same time, the project faces resistance from parts of the banking sector and from critics who question its cost, usefulness and impact on deposits. Banks are concerned that if consumers move too much money from commercial bank accounts into digital euro wallets, this could reduce deposits and affect bank funding. To address this, the digital euro would not pay interest and would be subject to holding limits. These limits have not yet been finally determined, but they are intended to ensure that the digital euro functions mainly as a payment instrument rather than a savings product.

 

Compensation for banks and payment service providers is another unresolved issue. The ECB would provide the underlying infrastructure, while banks and payment firms would distribute the digital euro to customers. Financial institutions are expected to be compensated for their role, while merchants are expected to pay fees that should be lower than existing card transaction costs. How exactly those fees and compensation arrangements will work remains one of the most contested points in the negotiations.


 

The project is also being shaped by the global race over digital money. China has already introduced its digital yuan, while Russia has announced plans for its digital rouble to become operational in September 2026. The United States has taken a different route, moving away from a central bank digital currency and supporting privately issued stablecoins. Because most global stablecoins are denominated in US dollars, Europe sees a strategic risk that dollar-based private digital money could further strengthen the dollar’s role in international payments.

 

For the EU, the digital euro is therefore not just about convenience. It is part of a wider contest over payment sovereignty, monetary influence and the future structure of digital finance. If adopted, it would create a euro-area-wide public payment system that could operate across countries, reduce fragmentation and provide an alternative to foreign-controlled payment rails.

 

However, the project still has political and technical hurdles ahead. The legal framework must be finalised, holding limits must be settled, privacy safeguards must be trusted by the public, banks must be given a workable economic model and merchants must see a reason to adopt it. The ECB has continued technical preparations, but it has also made clear that a final decision to issue the digital euro can only come after the relevant EU regulation is adopted.

 

The committee vote therefore marks progress, not completion. The digital euro is closer than before, but its final shape will depend on negotiations between Parliament, Member States, the Commission and the ECB. What is already clear is that Europe now treats payments as strategic infrastructure. In that sense, the digital euro has moved beyond a central bank technology project and become part of the EU’s broader effort to defend economic autonomy in a digital financial system increasingly shaped by global private platforms.

By fLEXI tEAM

Comments


bottom of page