top of page

Unpacking Concerns: Tax Foundation Economist Analyzes Pillar Two's Viability in International Tax Reform

Alan Cole, an economist at the Tax Foundation, has offered a nuanced critique of pillar two, a critical component of the international tax reform agenda. Cole's analysis delves deep into the potential shortcomings of pillar two, raising significant concerns about its efficacy and long-term viability.

Unpacking Concerns: Tax Foundation Economist Analyzes Pillar Two's Viability in International Tax Reform

In a meticulously crafted blog post dated February 27, Cole expressed apprehensions about the probability of pillar two failing to achieve its intended objectives. He cautioned that while the failure of pillar two might not be immediately apparent, the agreement could inadvertently perpetuate the very issues it was designed to address.

"Pillar two, the international global minimum tax agreement, has a considerable chance of failing," Cole stated emphatically in his post. He warned that the failure of pillar two could manifest in subtle ways, potentially allowing the underlying problems to persist despite the appearance of adherence to a 15% minimum tax rate.

At the heart of pillar two lies the mandate for multinational corporations with revenues exceeding €750 million to pay a minimum effective tax rate of 15% in all jurisdictions where they operate. This measure aims to curb profit shifting and ensure equitable tax contributions from global corporations.


However, Cole meticulously dissected the challenges inherent in defining both tax rates and income, which could potentially undermine the effectiveness of pillar two. He highlighted the complexities surrounding tax measurement and the inherent difficulty in accurately assessing income across diverse jurisdictions.

Moreover, Cole expressed skepticism about the adaptability of multilateral agreements like pillar two to evolving tax landscapes. He cautioned that the current rules of the agreement may lack long-term sustainability and could be vulnerable to exploitation by countries seeking to circumvent established tax rate measurements.

"Pillar two, like all systems, draws an arbitrary line," Cole explained, emphasizing the inherent challenges in devising a universally applicable tax framework. He warned that the arbitrary nature of tax rate measurement could represent a fundamental flaw in pillar two's foundation, potentially undermining its effectiveness in the long run.

Cole's critique of pillar two echoed concerns previously voiced by experts in the field. Chris Danes, a tax partner at MHA, aptly likened pillar two to using "a sledgehammer to crack a nut," highlighting the potential compliance burdens it could impose on multinational corporations.

Additionally, a report from the EU Tax Observatory shed light on potential loopholes and carveouts that could compromise the efficacy of the proposed 15% minimum corporate tax rate. These insights underscored the intricate challenges associated with international tax reform efforts and the imperative of devising comprehensive solutions that address the diverse interests and dynamics at play across different jurisdictions.

In conclusion, Alan Cole's meticulous analysis serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities inherent in international tax policy. As policymakers continue to navigate these challenges, it is imperative to adopt a nuanced and forward-thinking approach that balances the need for tax fairness with the realities of a globalized economy.


1,048 views0 comments


bottom of page